Opening

Casey's anti-social behavior can be understood as symptoms of sexual abuse. Her obsessive compulsive lying and promiscuity are not evidence that she killed or abused Caylee.

Monday, October 29, 2012

Foolproof Suffocation

"(2.) A. when talking about the search for foolproof suffocation. He claims that george had AOL Messenger and that casey did not..
WRONG...
casey had aol messenger her login name was casey o marie.. there were transcripts of AOL chats in the doc. dumps.
and There was testimony at the trial from people who used AOL chat to talk to her..
There are transcript of AOL chats from that very morning (june 16th) in the doc. dumps.
He claims that His proof that GA did this was because it was mispelled.. and GA was a poor speller....
Well He admitted in the book that casey did the search for the chloroform and that was mispelled.
He claims that GA did it because GA said casey was not home at the time.. but then he also claim a few pages later that casey was home.. so which is it..
Yes GA in interview said casey had left by then.. but remember there was alot of confusion.. GA also claimmed in the report that it was June 9th.
I do believe GA lied when saying that casey left earlier.... But i think in doing this He was either mistaken about the day or felt he was trying to lie to help casey..
Also Jose claims it was web searches for sucide.. well .. I beg to disagree.. I do not believe it is logical to assume that a person looking up sucides would type in foolproof suffocation to search for suicide.. also the link he refers to as being clicked was not a pro suicide site but an anti suicide blog.
If as jose says the search was done (and we have yet to see any proof of that) and He claims that casey was at home. I think it is more damming to her that the search was done then to george by a long shot.... Perhaps this is why he did not bring it up in court."
Review made by Susan Brown "SueB" on 7/16/2012, Amazon.Com Customer Reviews of Presumed Guilty by Jose Baez
http://www.amazon.com/Presumed-Guilty-Casey-Anthony-Inside/product-reviews/1937856380/ref=cm_cr_pr_top_link_next_14?ie=UTF8&pageNumber=14&showViewpoints=0&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending (Locate review by date.)

At the time when the foolproof suffocation search was taking place, Casey was on the phone with Amy. Amy testified that there was nothing unusual about the conversation. So it is unlikely that Casey was reading about foolproof suffocation at the same time. Also, the things Casey had been looking up on the Internet are totally inconsistent with the other things the person searching for foolproof suffocation had been looking at. Jose Baez may have been wrong about Casey not having an AIM account, but he is not wrong about Casey not being the one who searched for foolproof suffocation. That leaves only George Anthony who later tried to commit suicide. There is no contradiction in what Jose Baez wrote about Casey being or not being at the house. He first wrote that George said Casey left at 12:50 but someone was on the computer over an hour after that time.

"It had to have been George on the computer because he said Casey was gone, and he was the only one out there trying to kill himself."
Pages 182-183,  Presumed Guilty
Casey Anthony: The Inside Story
by Jose Baez and Peter Golenbock


Mr. Baez was only stating that if you believe Mr. Anthony when he said Casey had left, then Mr. Anthony would have to be the one who made the search. Mr. Baez never said he believed Mr. Anthony.

I don't understand why somebody would go to an anti-suicide blog to look up foolproof suffocation. Mr. Anthony must have been looking up foolproof suffocation to find the blog he found. Why would Mr. Anthony necessarily look up "suicide" instead of the specific form of suicide he was interested in?

2 comments:

  1. You're right, it is your blog. But you seem a little obsessive and not able to look at the evidence from a neutral standpoint. If you did, you would at least ask honest questions. I hope you find something better to believe in. This issue has been resolved. It is time to move on. Good luck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. How do I express my opinion while being "neutral." Am I obsessive because I contradict your opinion? Do you only consider questions honest that you would ask? If the issue is resolved, why do I still find unsupported assertions?

      Delete

"This is not a debate or a forum for you to spread misinformation and lies. This is a discussion among like-minded people."
Quoted from the moderator for http://www.karma4caylee.com/.
(Also, see NOTICE TO ALL HECKLERS.)

If you question my use of the same policy, contact me at turtlepace1@yahoo.com .